ESG Information Website
  • Home
  • Regulation
    • ECB
    • Federal Reserve
    • Hong Kong SFC
    • Hong Kong Monetary Authority
    • UK Financial Conduct Authority
    • European Banking Authority
    • Monetary Authority of Singapore
    • European Securities and Markets Association
    • European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority
  • Researches
    • Net Zero
    • Carbon Emissions
    • Climate Change
    • Responsible Investment
    • Sustainable Development
    • Biodiversity
  • Knowledge
    • ESG Definitions
    • ESG Greenwashing
    • ESG Taxonomy
  • Products
    • ESG Securities
    • ESG Funds
    • ESG Bonds
    • ESG Indices
  • TodayESG Insights
  • ESG in Europe
    • UK ESG
    • France ESG
    • Netherlands ESG
    • Switzerland ESG
    • Norway ESG
    • Luxembourg ESG
  • ESG in America
    • United States ESG
    • Canada ESG
  • ESG in Asia
    • China ESG
    • China Hong Kong ESG
    • Japan ESG
    • India ESG
    • Singapore ESG
    • Australia ESG
  • About Website
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
  • ESG Data
  • ESG Education
  • ESG Ratings
  • ESG Media Service
No Result
View All Result
ESG Information Website
No Result
View All Result
Home ESG Regulation

ICMA Responds to Sustainability Disclosure Requirements and Investment Labels

by TodayESG
in ESG Regulation, ESG Products, Global
ICMA

ICMA

Toggle
  • Response to Sustainability Disclosure Requirements
  • ICMA’s View on Greenwashing Problem
  • ICMA’s View on Sustainable Investment Label
  • ICMA’s View on SDR and SFDR

Response to Sustainability Disclosure Requirements

The International Capital Market Association (ICMA) replied to the draft Sustainability Disclosure Requirements (SDR) issued by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), and advised on the three types of sustainable investment labels.

ICMA believes that the proposal of SDR can help the financial industry to make greater contributions in the transformation of low-carbon economy, and the establishment of investment labels can facilitate the sustainable product development of asset management companies and help investors to select appropriate financial products.

ICMA’s View on Greenwashing Problem

ICMA believes that the regulatory authorities of all countries are working to solve the problem of greenwashing. In the absence of a consistent definition of “greenwashing”, the SDR proposed will reduce the possibility of active greenwashing. However, due to investors’ lack of understanding of ESG, there may be misinterpret in sustainable investment.

For example, ESG integration strategy refers to the inclusion of ESG factors in the analysis of the company’s financial performance during the investment process, so as to select the appropriate investment target. It does not represent the substantial impact of the company on the environment and society. However, for investors who cannot distinguish between them, the fund with ESG integration strategy may be regarded as an ESG fund (in fact, they are not related).

Sustainability Disclosure
Sustainability Disclosure

ICMA’s View on Sustainable Investment Label

When FCA proposed SDR, it also provided three types of sustainable investment labels for financial products (ESG integration strategy are not consistent with the definition of sustainable investment labels, but ICMA suggested that FCA could classify them as a new label), namely, Sustainable Focus, Sustainable Improvers and Sustainable Impact. ICMA has put forward different views on the classification methods and effects corresponding to the three labels.

For Sustainable Focus (investing at least 70% of its assets in specific ESG topics), ICMA questions that:

  1. Whether there are investment restrictions on the remaining 30% of assets;
  2. Whether the FCA can provide credible standards for specific ESG topics;
  3. Whether the FCA can provide examples of environmental and social theme under the sustainable development goals;

For Sustainable Improvers (investing in transition assets in line with the Paris Climate Agreement), ICMA questions that:

  1. How the company should measure the sustainability of assets;
  2. How does the company evaluate whether the KPI meets the scale or effect of the transition;
  3. If the final transition effect is not achieved, how to deal with the corresponding assets and funds;

For Sustainable Impact (investing in assets that will have sustainable impact), ICMA questions that:

  1. How the FCA measures sustainable impacts;
  2. How the FCA determines the frequency of disclosing sustainable impacts;
  3. How does the company ensure that negative impacts will not occur;

In combination with its own relevant provisions, ICMA believes that in fixed income investment, the bonds of Sustainable Focus can conform to ICMA social bonds and green bond standards, and the bonds of Sustainable Provers can conform to sustainable linked bond principles.

ICMA’s View on SDR and SFDR

ICMA also compared SDR and SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation of the European Union), and believed that there are certain differences between the two. For example, there is no level difference between the three sustainability labels mentioned in SDR, but Article 9 in SFDR is the highest level of sustainability fund. SDR also does not require disclosure of negative environmental and social impacts, but SFDR requires.

ICMA believes that SDR will expand to overseas funds in the future when it only imposes certain restrictions on UK funds currently. In this case, the comparison between SDR and SFDR will play a more important role.

Reference:

Response to the FCA’s consultation on Sustainability Disclosure Requirements (SDR) and investment labels
Contact:todayesg@gmail.com

Tags: EnglishICMASustainable Development
Previous Post

ESMA, EBA and EIOPA Issues Opinions on Sustainability Reporting Standards

Next Post

Deep Dive on EU Green Deal Industrial Plan

TodayESG

TodayESG

Search in TodayESG

No Result
View All Result

New Releases

ACCA
ESG Regulation

ACCA Releases Recommendations for European Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation

2025-6-13
AFME
ESG Research

AFME Releases 2025 Q1 ESG Financial Markets Report

2025-6-12
WMO
ESG Research

World Meteorological Organization Releases 2025 Global Climate Report

2025-6-11
UNGC
ESG Knowledge

United Nations Global Compact Releases Ocean Investment Protocol

2025-6-10
WEF
ESG Research

World Economic Forum Releases Report on Bioeconomy Policy and Practice

2025-6-9
ISSB
ESG Knowledge

ISSB Releases IFRS S2 Greenhouse Gas Emission Disclosure Requirements Education Material

2025-6-6

TodayESG in LinkedIn

  • Home
  • Regulation
  • Researches
  • Knowledge
  • Products
  • TodayESG Insights
  • ESG in Europe
  • ESG in America
  • ESG in Asia
  • About Website
  • Advertise
  • ESG Data
  • ESG Education
  • ESG Ratings
  • ESG Media Service

© 2025 todayesg.com - TodayESG.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Regulation
    • ECB
    • Federal Reserve
    • Hong Kong SFC
    • Hong Kong Monetary Authority
    • UK Financial Conduct Authority
    • European Banking Authority
    • Monetary Authority of Singapore
    • European Securities and Markets Association
    • European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority
  • Researches
    • Net Zero
    • Carbon Emissions
    • Climate Change
    • Responsible Investment
    • Sustainable Development
    • Biodiversity
  • Knowledge
    • ESG Definitions
    • ESG Greenwashing
    • ESG Taxonomy
  • Products
    • ESG Securities
    • ESG Funds
    • ESG Bonds
    • ESG Indices
  • TodayESG Insights
  • ESG in Europe
    • UK ESG
    • France ESG
    • Netherlands ESG
    • Switzerland ESG
    • Norway ESG
    • Luxembourg ESG
  • ESG in America
    • United States ESG
    • Canada ESG
  • ESG in Asia
    • China ESG
    • China Hong Kong ESG
    • Japan ESG
    • India ESG
    • Singapore ESG
    • Australia ESG
  • About Website
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
  • ESG Data
  • ESG Education
  • ESG Ratings
  • ESG Media Service

© 2025 todayesg.com - TodayESG.